Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matthew Moran's avatar

In my fylutile hunt for "Black Easter" in my garage I came across a couple of copies of "A Case for Concious". I knew "Black Easter" dealt with religion in the future but good to know he did others.

I noted that the evolution of the Lithia are very similar to the evolution of creatures in Edgar Rice Burroughs Caspak trilogy. Michael Moorcock will pick up on the theme of societal stagnation causing psychosis in such works as "The Deep Six" and his Jherek Cornelius books.

So another one to pull off the shelves and move to the TBR pile.

Expand full comment
Alan's avatar

I am glad you reviewed this, it is one of my favorites and does not receive sufficient attention.

I am also glad you found it upsetting and off-putting, that means it worked. As you know Blish was Catholic. His religion is I think subtly present in all his work, but here and in the other two books of the trilogy (Dr. Mirabilis and Black Easter) he deals with religion directly. I think Blish means for the secular rationalist SF reader to be absorbed by the world view of Father Ruiz and seriously consider - maybe he’s right. Maybe the Lithians are a trick of the Devil, and maybe the destruction of the planet and the exorcism are inextricably linked. Maybe the positive effect on society is another example of God turning the Devil’s work to the good. These are not comfortable concepts, particularly for a modern rationalist, so if you are upset and put off it might mean that your world view has been challenged. How you respond to that challenge is not the point, the point is that you have to deal with it.

Full disclosure, I am a Catholic and a rationalist SF reader and I don’t know how to ultimately resolve this book, I’m just glad he wrote it.

Thanks again.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts